Skip to content
777 Raptor

Blog · EMIL

The capital architecture — protected, profit, working

Splitting an account into protected capital, banked profit and working capital changes what a drawdown can reach. How the profit floor and high-water-mark guard work together.

4 June 2026777 Raptor3 min reademilriskcapital

Most accounts are a single number. Equity goes up, equity goes down, and every pound in the account is equally exposed to the next decision. That is a choice, even when nobody makes it deliberately.

Raptor lets an account be structured instead, and EMIL enforces the structure.

Three buckets

Protected capital. Your starting capital, or whatever portion of it you declare untouchable. Automation is not permitted to put it at risk. If a proposed position would draw on it, the order is refused before it becomes an order.

Banked profit. Gains that have been moved above the profit floor. Once banked, they join the protected side rather than being recycled into larger positions. This is the mechanism that stops a good month funding a worse one.

Working capital. The portion actually deployed. Exposure limits, daily loss budgets and drawdown guards all measure against this, not against total equity — which is why a 2% daily loss budget means 2% of what is genuinely at risk rather than 2% of everything you own.

Example
PROTECTED    10,000        Profit floor  11,400
PROFIT        2,841        Doubling milestone  20,000 (64.6%)
WORKING       1,420

The profit floor

The profit floor is a level below which equity is not permitted to fall while automation is armed. It ratchets upward as profit is banked, and never downward.

The consequence is specific: as an account grows, the amount automation is allowed to lose does not grow with it. A system that has done well has less latitude, not more. That is the opposite of how position sizing usually drifts.

The high-water-mark drawdown guard

Separately, EMIL tracks drawdown from the highest equity the account has reached, not from the start of the day or the start of the month. Reset the measurement window and you hide exactly the decline you needed to see.

You set the ceiling — 8% is a common starting point. Cross it and EMIL disarms itself and logs that it has done so. It does not reduce size and continue. It stops and hands control back.

The daily loss budget

A third, shorter-horizon control: a cash or percentage budget for the session. Consume it and EMIL stops acting for the day while continuing to observe. The log records that it has stopped and how much of the budget was consumed.

Three controls at three horizons — session, drawdown, and floor — because a bad hour, a bad fortnight and a structural decline are different problems.

What "protects the capital" honestly means

It means the boundaries are enforced in the order path, outside the intelligence layer, so nothing EMIL concludes can widen them. It means a refusal is logged with its reason. It means the guard measures from the high water mark rather than a convenient anchor. And it means arming requires you to read what you are authorising and type a confirmation.

It does not mean capital cannot be lost. Markets gap, liquidity thins, and a stop is an instruction to trade at the next available price rather than a promise of a level. Structure changes what is reachable by automation. It does not remove market risk, and any technology provider telling you otherwise is selling something.


Related: what EMIL does when armed · why a refused order should explain itself

Trading leveraged products carries a high level of risk to capital. Technology can improve analysis and controls; it cannot remove market risk.